acockle

/Andy Cockle
Andy Cockle

About Andy Cockle

Andy is a third generation legal brief printer. Cockle Law Brief Printing was founded in 1923 by Andy’s grandparents, who were both attorneys. At that time, the Cockles worked primarily with briefs that were filed in the Nebraska Supreme Court. In the 1980s, Andy and Trish—Andy’s sister and partner—guided the company to specialize in U.S. Supreme Court briefs. Andy is a lifelong resident of Omaha, and he obtained a Business degree from the University of Nebraska at Omaha. He started working at Cockle Law Brief Printing in 1982. Andy schedules briefs, handles marketing, tracks the Supreme Court’s docket, and fields the myriad questions that attorneys ask him in regard to filing a U.S. Supreme Court brief. He enjoys handball, rollerblading, reading and with his wife, Mary Helen, traveling to visit his two grown children.
27 Jan, 2012

New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing

2012-01-27T15:52:53-06:00January 27th, 2012|

New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing Brief for the Petitioner in Vasquez v. U.S., Inc., No. 11-199, filed on January 23, 2012 Brief for Petitioner in Hill v. U.S., No. 11-5721, filed on January 25, 2012 Brief for Petitioner in Dorsey v. U.S., No. 11-5683, filed on January 25, 2012

27 Jan, 2012

New Amicus Brief

2012-01-27T15:51:55-06:00January 27th, 2012|

Cockle Printing has prepared and filed the Brief for Amici Curiae Gathie Barnett Edmonds and Marie Barnett Snodgrass in Support of Petitioners in Morgan v. Swanson, No. 11-804.

27 Jan, 2012

New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing

2012-01-27T15:48:05-06:00January 27th, 2012|

Brief for the Petitioner in Vasquez v. U.S., Inc., No. 11-199, filed on January 23, 2012 Brief for Petitioner in Hill v. U.S., No. 11-5721, filed on January 25, 2012 Brief for Petitioner in Dorsey v. U.S., No. 11-5683, filed on January 25, 2012

24 Jan, 2012

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

2019-03-18T18:47:48-05:00January 24th, 2012|

The Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom has filed its Argument Supporting the Respondents, and Addressing the Minimum Coverage Provision in DHHS v. Florida, No. 11-398, and you can read it at the Cockle Printing website.

20 Jan, 2012

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

2019-03-18T18:47:48-05:00January 20th, 2012|

Three sets of amici have recently filed briefs in DHHS v. Florida, No. 11-398: Brief Amici Curiae of Prescription Policy Choices, Professors of Law, and Professors of Health Policy in Support of Petitioners on the Minimum Coverage Provision Brief of Health Care For All, Inc., Health Law Advocates, Inc. The Massachusetts Hospital Association, Inc., The [...]

20 Jan, 2012

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

2012-01-20T17:38:20-06:00January 20th, 2012|

Three sets of amici have recently filed briefs in DHHS v. Florida, No. 11-398: Brief Amici Curiae of Prescription Policy Choices, Professors of Law, and Professors of Health Policy in Support of Petitioners on the Minimum Coverage Provision Brief of Health Care For All, Inc., Health Law Advocates, Inc. The Massachusetts Hospital Association, Inc., The Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, Inc., Greater Boston Interfaith Organization, Inc., and Community Catalyst, Inc., as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners Urging Reversal on the Minimum Coverage Provision Issue. Brief of Amici Curiae Jewish Alliance for Law & Social Action (JALSA), Jewish Council on Urban Affairs (JCUA), Jewish Social Policy Action Network (JSPAN), New England Jewish Labor committee (JLC), and Professor Abigail R. Moncrieff in Support of Petitioners on the Individual Liberty Implications of the Minimum Coverage Provision