acockle

/Andy Cockle
Andy Cockle

About Andy Cockle

Andy is a third generation legal brief printer. Cockle Law Brief Printing was founded in 1923 by Andy’s grandparents, who were both attorneys. At that time, the Cockles worked primarily with briefs that were filed in the Nebraska Supreme Court. In the 1980s, Andy and Trish—Andy’s sister and partner—guided the company to specialize in U.S. Supreme Court briefs. Andy is a lifelong resident of Omaha, and he obtained a Business degree from the University of Nebraska at Omaha. He started working at Cockle Law Brief Printing in 1982. Andy schedules briefs, handles marketing, tracks the Supreme Court’s docket, and fields the myriad questions that attorneys ask him in regard to filing a U.S. Supreme Court brief. He enjoys handball, rollerblading, reading and with his wife, Mary Helen, traveling to visit his two grown children.
9 Jan, 2012

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

2012-01-09T21:36:47-06:00January 9th, 2012|

Certain members of the United States Senate have filed their Brief as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners on the Issue of Severability in NFIB v. Sebelius, No. 11-393, and Florida v. DHHS, No. 11-400, and you can read it at the Cockle Printing website.

9 Jan, 2012

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

2012-01-09T21:33:58-06:00January 9th, 2012|

Certain members of the United States Senate have filed their Brief as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners on the Issue of Severability in NFIB v. Sebelius, No. 11-393, and Florida v. DHHS, No. 11-400, and you can read it here.

6 Jan, 2012

Healthcare Litigation Briefing Schedule

2019-03-18T18:47:49-05:00January 6th, 2012|

We have started filing briefs in the healthcare litigation cases, so I have reposted here Katie Collister's excellent discussion of the Court's scheduling order: Finally...A Briefing Schedule!  Last night the Supreme Court, in a rare departure from traditional practice, adopted a formal briefing schedule in the three vided Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act cases. [...]

6 Jan, 2012

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

2012-01-06T18:48:38-06:00January 6th, 2012|

Freedom Watch has filed its Amicus Brief on the Issue of Recusal or Disqualification of Justice Kagan in NFIB v. Sebelius, No. 11-393, and Floriday v. Dept. of Health and Human Services, No. 11-400, and you can read it at the Cockle Printing website.

6 Jan, 2012

New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing

2012-01-06T18:25:04-06:00January 6th, 2012|

Reply Brief for the Petitioner in Coleman v. Maryland Ct. of Appeals, No. 10-1016, filed on December 27, 2011 Brief for Petitioners in Armour v. Indianapolis, No. 11-161, filed on December 29, 2011 Petitioner’s Reply Brief in Vartelas v. Holder, No. 10-1211, filed on December 30, 2011 Reply Brief for Petitioner in Roberts v. Sea-Land [...]