acockle

/Andy Cockle
Andy Cockle

About Andy Cockle

Andy is a third generation legal brief printer. Cockle Law Brief Printing was founded in 1923 by Andy’s grandparents, who were both attorneys. At that time, the Cockles worked primarily with briefs that were filed in the Nebraska Supreme Court. In the 1980s, Andy and Trish—Andy’s sister and partner—guided the company to specialize in U.S. Supreme Court briefs. Andy is a lifelong resident of Omaha, and he obtained a Business degree from the University of Nebraska at Omaha. He started working at Cockle Law Brief Printing in 1982. Andy schedules briefs, handles marketing, tracks the Supreme Court’s docket, and fields the myriad questions that attorneys ask him in regard to filing a U.S. Supreme Court brief. He enjoys handball, rollerblading, reading and with his wife, Mary Helen, traveling to visit his two grown children.
6 May, 2016

May 6th: Recently Filed Petition

2016-05-06T14:20:39-05:00May 6th, 2016|

To read this Supreme Court petition, click the heading to open this post, then follow the link! Bldg. Indus. Ass’n of the Bay Area v. U.S. Dep’t of Commerce, filed on May 3, 2016

22 Apr, 2016

The Making of a Reversal (part 4)

2019-03-18T18:47:22-05:00April 22nd, 2016|

The previous parts of this look at the docket for a major regulatory case that ended with a decision upholding the government tracked the timelines and procedural stages. This final part looks a bit more closely at the several organizations and people who offered their thoughts to the Court without official invitation or direct interest [...]

22 Apr, 2016

April 22nd: Recently Filed Petitions

2016-04-22T14:27:33-05:00April 22nd, 2016|

To read any of these Supreme Court petitions, click the heading to open this post, then follow the links! Pauma Band of the Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. California, filed on April 18, 2016 DiLeo v. U.S., filed on April 18, 2016

21 Apr, 2016

The Making of a Reversal (part 3)

2016-04-21T21:46:31-05:00April 21st, 2016|

Merits Stage: Once the Court granted certiorari in the consolidated cases, moving it from the petition phase to the merits phase, the Court’s focus shifted from whether to decide the dispute to how to resolve it. And that called for a whole new round of briefing from the parties and any old or new “friends.” [...]

20 Apr, 2016

The Making of a Reversal (part 2)

2016-04-20T18:59:03-05:00April 20th, 2016|

Petition Stage: The linked regulatory cases that are the subject of this four-part look at the Supreme Court’s docket began in the typical way for any request for certiorari review, with final decisions at the top of a chain of lower courts. On May 23, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of [...]

19 Apr, 2016

The Making of a Reversal (part 1)

2019-03-18T18:47:22-05:00April 19th, 2016|

If you follow a big U.S. Supreme Court case in the news, you see an occasional milestone – certiorari petition filed, cert. granted, oral argument, and the decision – and you hear from the lead counsel for the two sides, along with all the commentary from talking heads. If you follow it on the Court’s [...]

18 Mar, 2016

March 18th: Recently Filed Petitions

2016-03-18T14:30:54-05:00March 18th, 2016|

To read any of these Supreme Court petitions, click the heading to open this post, then follow the links! Mondaca-Vega v. Lynch, filed on March 14, 2016 Michigan v. EPA, filed on March 14, 2016 Bowen v. Texas, filed on March 15, 2016

15 Mar, 2016

Petition Appendix (pt 5)

2021-01-12T12:27:30-06:00March 15th, 2016|Tags: |

The first four parts of this series covered the Supreme Court appendix contents that are either required or that are too lengthy to leave in the brief. This final installment addresses a provision that allows pretty much anything, but that should be used with caution. Other Material Believed Essential. Rule 14.1(i)(vi) is the tempting catchall [...]

11 Mar, 2016

March 11th: Recently Filed Petitions

2016-03-11T15:28:14-06:00March 11th, 2016|

To read any of these Supreme Court petitions, click the heading to open this post, then follow the links! Kim v. Virginia, filed on February 29, 2016 Morales v. Lynch, filed on March 7, 2016 Flowers v. Troup Cnty. Sch. Dist., filed on March 10, 2016

10 Mar, 2016

Petition Appendix (pt 4)

2021-01-12T12:26:56-06:00March 10th, 2016|

Rehearing Denial. The last required appendix document may or may not exist, but if it does, it goes at the end of the required category. This would be an order denying rehearing by the court that issued the final judgment you are directly challenging. Rule 14.1(i)(iii). Or the last document may be something else, depending [...]