shopwood

/Shon R. Hopwood
Shon R. Hopwood

About Shon R. Hopwood

Shon R Hopwood’s unusual legal journey began not at law school, but federal prison, where he learned to write briefs for other prisoners. Two petitions for certiorari he prepared were later granted review by the United States Supreme Court, and the story of his legal success was the subject of articles in the New York Times, the Saturday Evening Post, and Above the Law. His work has been published in the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties and Fordham Law Reviews. He is a consultant at Cockle Law Brief Printing Company, and a student and Gates Public Service Scholar at the University of Washington School of Law. In August of 2012, Crown/Random House will publish his memoir entitled “Law Man: My Story of Robbing Banks, Winning Supreme Cases and Finding Redemption.” Through a decade of letters, Shon convinced his kind and beautiful wife, Ann Marie, to marry him. He has one cute but incredibly ornery son, Mark Raymond, and a precious and beautiful baby girl, Grace. Shon enjoys liberty, the writing of the Apostle Paul, Amy Hempel, and Raymond Carver, the music of Radiohead, and watching the Nebraska Cornhuskers football team. Follow me at: @shonhopwood
6 Apr, 2010

The Forgotten Section of a Supreme Court Brief

2019-03-18T18:48:13-05:00April 6th, 2010|Tags: , , , , , |

If I had to pick the one section most frequently overlooked by attorneys filing cert petitions, it is what we at Cockle colloquially call the “appendix index.”  That section has gained importance because the Supreme Court recently amended their rules to require an index in every brief containing an appendix.  In this post, I will [...]

30 Mar, 2010

Arguing Importance When No Circuit Split Is Present

2019-03-18T18:48:13-05:00March 30th, 2010|Tags: , , , |

What happens when your petition for writ of certiorari does not contain an arguable claim of lower court conflict?  The absence of a split is challenging for any Supreme Court practitioner, given that the primary reason the Court grants cert is to resolve lower court conflicts.  While some petitioners attempt to create a conflict, the [...]

10 Mar, 2010

A Tour of Talent: My Weekend Trip to Harvard University

2019-03-18T18:48:13-05:00March 10th, 2010|Tags: , , , , , |

My wife Annie and I had a wonderful trip to Harvard University.  We stayed at the famous Preacher’s Suite in Lowell House, and Sandy Alexander of WilmerHale was a gracious host.  The following is a recap of our trip. We toured the Cambridge campus on Saturday.  I gave a short speech to a group of [...]

5 Mar, 2010

Court News for the First Week of March

2019-03-18T18:48:13-05:00March 5th, 2010|Tags: , , , , , , , , |

It was another hectic week at the Court, starting with an order in Kiyemba v. Obama, No 08-1234, where the Court remanded “in light of new developments.”  One of those developments was the fact that all seven petitioners were offered settlements in other countries.   On Monday, the Court granted certiorari in Michigan v. Bryant, No. [...]

5 Mar, 2010

Weekend Trip to Harvard University

2010-11-24T19:04:26-06:00March 5th, 2010|Tags: , , , , , , |

My wife Ann Marie and I are traveling to Boston tomorrow for a three-day trip to Harvard University.  I have been asked to speak to a group of Harvard faculty and undergrad students, and on Monday, I will be sitting in on a criminal law school class. The trip is exciting for a number of [...]

24 Feb, 2010

Busy Week at the Supreme Court

2019-03-18T18:48:13-05:00February 24th, 2010|Tags: , , , , , , , , |

The Court began the week with a flurry granting two cert petitions on Monday in Los Angeles County v. Humphries, No. 09-350 and Harrington v. Richter, No. 09-587.   In Humprhies, the Court was asked to rectify a circuit split on whether a plaintiff, in a request for declaratory relief, must demonstrate that the constitutional violation was [...]

5 Feb, 2010

Quon Topside Brief Filed

2019-03-18T18:48:14-05:00February 5th, 2010|Tags: , , , |

Today, the Petitioner’s Brief and Joint Appendix were filed in City of Ontario, et al. v. Quon, et al., No. 08-1332.  The Quon case involves the issue of whether the search of a government-issued text-messaging pager used by a SWAT member to send and receive hundreds of personal messages violates the Fourth Amendment right to unreasonable searches [...]