Briefs Filed Archives - Page 49 of 50

27 Jan, 2011

Camreta v. Greene Respondent’s Brief

Andy Cockle2011-01-27T22:51:45-06:00January 27th, 2011|Tags: criminal law, Fourth Amendment, school children, seizure|

The Respondent's Brief in Camreta v. Greene, No. 09-1454 and Alford v. Greene, No. 09-1478, was filed this week. The case involves whether the Fourth Amendment prohibits the temporary seizure and interview of a child at a public school when allegations of abuse are present.

20 Jan, 2011

Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri Merits Briefs

Andy Cockle2019-03-18T18:48:07-05:00January 20th, 2011|Tags: 09-1476, Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri, First Amendment, Petition Clause|

On Tuesday, we filed the Respondent's Brief in Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania, et al v. Guarnieri, No. 09-1476. Since SCOTUS Blog does not appear to have the Petitioner's Brief on their site, I thought we would place this one on the blogosphere as well.

14 Jan, 2011

New Merits Briefs

Andy Cockle2019-03-18T18:48:07-05:00January 14th, 2011|Tags: 10-238, 10-293, 10-5443, Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett, Fowler v. United States, McComish v. Bennett|

We filed three Petitioner's briefs this week in the following cases: McComish v. Bennett, No. 10-239 Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett, No. 10-238 Fowler v. United States, No. 10-5443

9 Dec, 2010

Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri–Petitioner’s Brief

Andy Cockle2010-12-09T16:28:21-06:00December 9th, 2010|Tags: Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri, Dan Ortiz, University of Virginia Supreme Court Clinic|

One of the CockleBur contributors, Dan Ortiz, recently filed this Petitioner's Brief in Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri, No. 09-1476. The Question Presented in the case is: Can public employees sue their employers under the Petition Clause for adverse employment actions allegedly resulting from the employees’ petitioning on matters of purely private concern?

24 Nov, 2010

New Merits Briefs

Andy Cockle2019-03-18T18:48:11-05:00November 24th, 2010|Tags: reply briefs, Thompson v. North American Stainless, Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart et al., Walker v. Martin|

Cockle Printing filed reply briefs in the following cases: Thompson v. North American Stainless, No. 09-291; Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart et al., No. 09-529; and Walker v. Martin, No. 09-996. To view the briefs follow this link.

15 Nov, 2010

Merits Briefs

Andy Cockle2019-03-18T18:48:11-05:00November 15th, 2010|Tags: Boeing v. United States, Kentucky v. King, Pepper v. United States, Petitioner's Brief, Stern v. Marshal, Sykes v. United States|

On Friday, the following merits briefs were filed in the U.S. Supreme Court. The briefs can be viewed at this link. The Petitioner's Brief was filed in Stern v. Marshall, No. 10-179; Boeing v. United States, No. 09-1302; Sykes v. United States, No. 09-11311; and Kentucky v. King, No. 09-1271. A Reply Brief was filed in Pepper v. United States, No. 09-6822.

15 Oct, 2010

09-529 Commonwealth of Virginia v. Stewart, et al.

Tiffany Greene2019-03-18T18:48:12-05:00October 15th, 2010|

urticaria treatmentp>The Respondent’s Brief in 09-529 Commonwealth of Virginia v. Stewart, et al. was filed yesterday. The brief can be viewed here.</p zp8497586rq

7 Oct, 2010

The CockleBur Is Launched

Shon R. Hopwood2019-03-18T18:48:12-05:00October 7th, 2010|Tags: blog, The CockleBur|

A new legal blog called “The CockleBur” has been launched. The blog features authors such as Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California at Irvine, David Franklin of DePaul, Ron Sullivan of Harvard, Palma Strand of Creighton, and Dan Ortiz of the University of Virginia, just to name a few. The CockleBur is hosted by Cockle Law Brief Printing [...]

20 Apr, 2010

Court Grants Four Petitions, Hears Argument in Christian Legal Society and Quon

Shon R. Hopwood2019-03-18T18:48:13-05:00April 20th, 2010|Tags: American Bank, Costco v. Omega, No. 08-1423, No. 09-400, No. 09-846, No. 09-907, Ransom v. MBNA, Staub v. Proctor Hospital, United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation|

The Court granted four cert petitions yesterday morning. The issues presented in those petitions included bankruptcy matters, the Court of Federal Claims’ jurisdiction, the first-sale doctrine of the Copyright Act and in what circumstances an employer is liable based on the unlawful intent of officials who caused or influenced but did not make the ultimate [...]

13 Apr, 2010

Quon Reply Brief

Shon R. Hopwood2019-03-18T18:48:13-05:00April 13th, 2010|Tags: City of Ontario v. Quon, No. 08-1332, reply brief|

The merits reply brief in City of Ontario v. Quon, No. 08-1332, was filed yesterday. The brief can be viewed here.