Constitutional Law

/Constitutional Law
25 Feb, 2011

The Chamber of Commerce: A Friend of the Court (and vice versa)

2019-03-18T18:48:05-05:00February 25th, 2011|Tags: , , , , , |

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court ruled that people who are injured or killed by the side effects of vaccines cannot sue vaccine manufacturers for alleged design defects.  Another day, another victory in the Supreme Court for a business defendant—and another victory for preemption, the legal doctrine under which state law can be [...]

15 Feb, 2011

Does the Constitution Require Same-Sex Marriage?

2019-03-18T18:48:06-05:00February 15th, 2011|Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Whether gay marriage is a good thing and whether the constitution requires it are two different questions. In this video from a recent Columbus Federalist Society debate, Volokh Conspirator Jonathan Adler, NRO "Bench Memos" blogger Ed Whelan, and Capital Law Prof. Mark Strasser debate the second question. (I moderate.)

25 Jan, 2011

Rahm Emanuel and the combination of statutory and constitutional arguments

2019-03-18T18:48:07-05:00January 25th, 2011|

The litigation over Rahm Emanuel’s eligibility to be on the ballot for Mayor of Chicago illustrates a type of argument that can often be very effective. The statute at issue can plausibly be construed in Emanuel’s favor – but, as the decision of the appellate court indicates, this construction is not inevitable. Emanuel has plausible [...]

25 Jan, 2011

Keeping The House In Constitutional Order?

2019-03-18T18:48:07-05:00January 25th, 2011|

At the initiative of House Republicans, the House recently changed its rules to allow the reading of the whole Constitution on the floor on the House’s opening day and to require each bill introduced in the House to be accompanied by a statement in the Congressional Record “citing as specifically as practicable [...]

15 Dec, 2010

Health insurance mandates and facial challenges

2019-03-18T18:48:10-05:00December 15th, 2010|Tags: , , |

Judge Henry Hudson’s recent decision striking down the central provision of the health insurance reform statute has gotten (pardon the pun) nearly universal coverage in the legal blogosphere. But I was struck by a section of the opinion that has received little notice: the passage early in his opinion in which Judge [...]

13 Dec, 2010

The Affordable Care Act is Unconstitutional

2019-03-18T18:48:10-05:00December 13th, 2010|Tags: , , , |

Federal District Court Judge Henry E. Hudson ruled on Monday that the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate requiring citizens to purchase health care insurance amounts to an unconstitutional expansion of the Commerce Clause. The historic 42-page ruling can be found here.  If the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirms this decision and other courts find [...]

10 Dec, 2010

The President Acknowledges that the Pre-Existing Injuries Portion of the Affordable Care Act could also be in Jeopardy

2019-03-18T18:48:11-05:00December 10th, 2010|Tags: , , , |

Randy Barnett, at The Volokh Conspiracy, posted this article about a fact sheet recently provided by the White House. The fact sheet addresses the pending constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate currently before Judge Henry Hudson. In anticipation of a ruling, the White House admitted that should the individual mandate be held unconstitutional, the portion of the Act requiring insurance companies to accept and cover people with pre-existing injuries would likewise fall. The fact sheet explained: