Legal minds on legal matters and whatever else strikes our fancy.
Below are some of the Court’s legal brief formatting rules that you may find surprising whether you are a first-time filer in the Supreme Court or a seasoned pro. 10. Except for in an “in forma pauperis” case, all briefs must be in a 6 1/8 by 9 1/4 inch booklet. 9. In a petition [...]
One of the services most valued by attorneys is proofreading. Because our goal is for all briefs to be as clean as possible when finished, at Cockle Legal Briefs, your documents are proofread, word-for-word, by two professionally-trained legal proofreaders. Our legal proofreaders are trained to read documents for misspellings, grammatical errors, improper sentence structure, and [...]
Kelmar v. Clarke, filed on January 2, 2015 Cnty. of Santa Cruz v. Burwell, filed on January 7 2015 Jackson v. Louisville Ladder, Inc., filed on January 8, 2015 New Hampshire v. McKenna, filed on January 8, 2015
The Rules of the U.S. Supreme Court provide very specific guidelines for proper legal brief formatting. When the staff at Cockle Legal Briefs examines a brief for rule compliance, we focus on three main areas to confirm that the brief will meet the strict legal brief formatting requirements of the Court: necessary content, proper font [...]
Selecting a legal brief printer for your Supreme Court filing can be as important as the content of your brief itself. You have made it as far as appealing your case to the Supreme Court. Do not skimp on the important details that could keep your brief from being accepted by the Court. When you file [...]
Brock v. Florida, filed on December 26, 2014 Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC, filed on December 26, 2014 Lundin v. Kernard, filed on December 26, 2014 Farris v. Degginger, filed on December 30, 2014
One of the most common questions we hear from our customers is, “How late can I send you my Supreme Court brief draft?” And many of those customers are surprised to learn that in most instances, they can send the draft as late as the morning before the due date (and sometimes even later if [...]
APPELLATE BRIEF PROCESS - LEGAL BRIEF PRINTING At Cockle Legal Briefs we believe that Better Briefs Win. We strive to craft the highest quality briefs. We succeed because we are the only Supreme Court brief printer to proofread everything with teams of two professional readers. Our staff actively pursues an intimate knowledge of Court practices [...]
Brief For Respondent in Tex. Dep’t of Hous. and Cmty. Affairs v. The Inclusive Cmties. Project, Inc., No. 13-1371, filed on December 17th.
Mitchell v. U.S., filed on December 12, 2014 Walker v. California, filed on December 16, 2014 SHAC, LLC v. Nev. Dep’t of Taxation, filed on December 17, 2014