Blog

/Blog/

The Cockle Bur Blog

Legal minds on legal matters and whatever else strikes our fancy.

23 Jan, 2012

Attaching a GPS Device to a Car Is a Fourth Amendment Search

2012-01-23T16:08:13-06:00January 23rd, 2012|Tags: , , , |

In a big loss for the federal government, the Supreme Court held today that when the government attaches a GPS device to a vehicle to monitor the vehicle's movement, the government conducts a Fourth Amendment search. Justice Scalia wrote the opinion for the Court in United States v. Jones, No. 10-1259, backed by the Chief Justice, [...]

20 Jan, 2012

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

2019-03-18T18:47:48-05:00January 20th, 2012|

Three sets of amici have recently filed briefs in DHHS v. Florida, No. 11-398: Brief Amici Curiae of Prescription Policy Choices, Professors of Law, and Professors of Health Policy in Support of Petitioners on the Minimum Coverage Provision Brief of Health Care For All, Inc., Health Law Advocates, Inc. The Massachusetts Hospital Association, Inc., The [...]

20 Jan, 2012

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

2012-01-20T17:38:20-06:00January 20th, 2012|

Three sets of amici have recently filed briefs in DHHS v. Florida, No. 11-398: Brief Amici Curiae of Prescription Policy Choices, Professors of Law, and Professors of Health Policy in Support of Petitioners on the Minimum Coverage Provision Brief of Health Care For All, Inc., Health Law Advocates, Inc. The Massachusetts Hospital Association, Inc., The Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, Inc., Greater Boston Interfaith Organization, Inc., and Community Catalyst, Inc., as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners Urging Reversal on the Minimum Coverage Provision Issue. Brief of Amici Curiae Jewish Alliance for Law & Social Action (JALSA), Jewish Council on Urban Affairs (JCUA), Jewish Social Policy Action Network (JSPAN), New England Jewish Labor committee (JLC), and Professor Abigail R. Moncrieff in Support of Petitioners on the Individual Liberty Implications of the Minimum Coverage Provision

19 Jan, 2012

Attorney Abandonment Matters at the Supreme Court

2019-03-18T18:47:49-05:00January 19th, 2012|Tags: , , , |

Yesterday, Justice Ginsburg announced the decision in Maples v. Thomas. For the second time in the last two years, the Supreme Court said that it matters when an attorney abandons their client. It Matters. For prisoners this is good news for those pursuing postconviction relief. The Court has long held that a criminal defendant has no right to [...]